exposing the dark side of adoption
Register Log in

Face of the Future

public

Carters finally have a name for the object of their affection

Sacramento Bee

Long way home Fourth in an occasional

series Bee staff writer Don Bosley and

photographer Hector Amezcua are following Noreen and Colin Carter

through the international adoption process toward the

precious prize - a baby from Kazakhstan.

HEADLINE: Face of the future? After false starts and frustrations, the

Carters finally have a name for the object of their affection

BYLINE: Don Bosley Bee Staff Writer

BODY:

Whisper her name.

Form the syllables clumsily, uncertainly. But not too loudly. Not yet.

She's got gorgeous blue peepers, don't you think? Even on videotape,

they sparkle like tiny, mischievous diamonds. And that blond

hair, done up in tiny clips of lime and yellow and ... oh, look, look,

look! Shaking her head like that, to say "no"! How adorable!

Lean in closer. Strain to hear the Kazakh caregivers calling to her.

Command your lips and tongue to mimic them.

Whisper her name.

She is 20 months old. Twenty-four pounds. A child with an adoption

number and little else, ambling suddenly into your living

room, straight through your realm of possibility and full speed into

your heart. Ambling, by the way, with the cutest, bowlegged

little gait.

She is such a treasure, such a stunning discovery, that you wouldn't

dare use her real first name in the newspaper, for fear that

another adoption agency will go find her and skirt her off to a home

that isn't yours.

But you can whisper her name to yourself. Over and over, again and

again, until the syllables comply and fit, as if you've said them

all your life.

We will call her little "Olga." Noreen and Colin Carter, God willing,

will call her "daughter."

"People who are struggling with the adoption process, I can relate to

them," Colin says. "But that's all behind us now. We've

forgotten about it already."

* * *

Two weeks earlier.

"It is such a frustrating process," Noreen Carter is saying with equal

parts venom and despair. "Everybody says that, no matter

what you read, you should prepare to be frustrated. And you think you

know what they mean."

But you can't know. You can't know the adoption experience until the

experience comes to know you, until it moves in and starts

tossing pieces of your life around like so many flapjacks. Which way

things will land, nobody seems completely certain, and your

gut clenches while it's all up in the air.

You just can't know. It's a lot like adding a child biologically, when

you get right down to it.

Four months after setting out to adopt a baby daughter from Kazakhstan,

the Carters felt as though they were taking heavy flak

and gaining no ground. They were tired, confused and growing more

embittered by the day. They hadn't seen a single videotape of a

prospective child yet, and it didn't look as if they would see one

anytime soon.

They had dreamt of taking 10-year-old son Dakota to Kazakhstan with them

to pick up the baby; that plan was now meeting

with blunt discouragement from World Partners Adoptions. They had hoped

to have the baby back home by August, before Colin

returned to his professor's job at the University of California, Davis,

for the fall semester; that script was now being torpedoed by

all manner of delays, meaning the family would likely have to wait until

January to travel for the child.

The processing of the home study was taking longer than they'd expected.

For one week in April, Kazakhstan's government put

international adoptions on hold; the Carters could never figure out

whether the whole country was shut down, or just some regions,

or just specific adoption agencies. In any event, it forced World

Partners to cancel trips for several adoptive parents and pushed the

whole process further back for everybody.

It was maddening - and visibly draining on Colin and Noreen. They were

good people, trying to provide a good home to an orphan

who had none, and prepared to shell out $25,000 or so to do it. Common

sense told them that this shouldn't be that complicated.

"Part of you wants to say, just grin and bear it. This is a small part

of the process," Noreen said. "But then ... well, let's just say

that there's a heck of a lot that seems like it could be simpler.

"You know, our neighbors adopted a child, and they didn't have to go any

farther than Woodland. Maybe we should think about

that."

For weeks, things had been getting increasingly tense between the

Carters and World Partners. Noreen and Colin had grown

exasperated with what they felt were vague answers and a heavy-handed,

authoritarian tone from the Georgia-based agency; WPA

was plainly growing weary of clients who refused to trust it or yield to

its expertise.

Clearly, the biggest irritant for both sides was the issue of Dakota in

Kazakhstan.

From the start, the Carters had wanted their boy along for the three- or

four-week adventure. When they began working with WPA

in January, they believed the agency was open to the idea. They had

asked WPA for references from other adoptive families, and a

woman named Candace in Florida reported that her 8-year-old daughter had gone with her to Kazakhstan and had had a fabulous

experience, being openly welcomed at the Baby House (orphanage) for one visit each day.

Right then, Colin and Noreen had begun to imagine the most awesome,

month long family outing they had ever dreamed of.

"My first vision of this was the three of us going over as a family and

bonding with this child as a family, and it being this

wonderful month that we would spend together," Noreen said.

"Now, at every turn, it's turning out not to be that. They're saying

there's a chance that we'll get over there, and Dakota never steps

inside the orphanage. He stays with my sister all day long in an

apartment."

WPA officials were not in the mood to deliver this news gently. One

memo, in particular, laid out the agency's protests in a sea of

italicized fonts, capitalized phrases and exclamation points. It listed

a half-dozen reasons why bringing a child to Kazakhstan was

a horrible idea, and it didn't exactly invite further discussion on the

topic.

"Kazakhstan is just a difficult trip," says Cindy Harding, executive

director of WPA, which placed more than 100 children from

Kazakhstan last year.

"We worry about medical conditions there if a child gets sick. If a

child gets sick, we don't want that to distract the parents from

what they're there to do. And our facilitators are so busy working on

the adoptions, they don't want the families to be distracted by

anything.

"We're not saying that families can't bring their children. We're just

trying to give them the facts."

The Carters didn't take it that way. In their household, the

exclamatory, italicized memo immediately had its own name: the

nastygram.

"It was so negative. I was really upset," Noreen said on April 10.

Added Colin: "We were really thinking about changing agencies."

Added Noreen: "We still are."

* * *

Eighty miles down the road, Ed Taylor and Peri Fletcher are whispering

the name of another Kazakh baby.

Ed and Peri were the reason the Carters embarked on this adoption

adventure in the first place. The Berkeley couple, with

biological children ages 5 and 9, made the decision last fall to add to

their family by adoption.

Ed is a colleague of Colin's at UC Davis, and in November he had steered

his friend to a Web site picture of Lara - the beautiful

toddler daughter that he and Peri were adopting from Kazakhstan. The

Carters were astonished and hooked. They followed Ed

and Peri right to WPA's door.

"The thing I like about international adoption," Peri said in March, "is

that the child is unequivocally yours."

But little Lara never came home to Ed and Peri. She never will. Ed and

Peri found themselves in a increasingly frustrating,

deteriorating relationship with WPA. The trip to Kazakhstan was

postponed several times, once by the governmental delay.

Relatives put vacation plans on hold so they could watch Ed and Peri's

children while they were in Kazakhstan, but each time

their schedule-juggling was for naught.

The situation seemed to grow worse and worse. Resigned, weary and

feeling their confidence in WPA eroding, Ed and Peri finally

did what was once unthinkable. In May, they cut their ties to WPA and

forfeited their claim on Lara.

They were out about $3,700 in various fees, all nonrefundable. But the

emotional total was far greater. After more than six months

of watching Lara on video, of preparing a room and a life for her, the

family grieves now over a child it never met.

"It's not an abstract thing," Peri said this week. "You've seen her on

video, you've heard her laugh. I don't want to trivialize what

other people's experiences have been. But it does feel to me like losing

a child."

There was a momentary thought of trying another agency, another country.

Guatemala, maybe.

But their hearts are no longer in it. They need a breather. Maybe a very

long one.

"To be honest with you," Peri says, "I don't have high hopes of adopting

another child now."

* * *

Back in Davis, the Carters considered the disturbing odyssey of their

friends, considered their own growing angst and began to

waver.

Following WPA procedure, they had asked the agency for videos of five

children in Kazakhstan. They were told that some videos

were already being viewed by other families. In other cases, the

children in question were in regions of Kazakhstan that Dakota

would not be allowed to visit.

(WPA and other agencies insist that accompanying children be taken only to the safer regions of the country.)

All the while, a watershed document lingered on the Carters' kitchen

counter. It was a formal contract with World Partners that

would bind the couple to the agency and require a down payment of

$3,500.

Noreen and Colin stared and stared at it. They just couldn't sign it.

Slowly at first, then with increasing purpose, Colin began checking out

other agencies that offered adoption services to

Kazakhstan. He found several, each with strong and weak points.

One of the most intriguing was Tree of Life, a 3-year-old outfit out of

Portland, Ore. Tree of Life placed 113 children last year,

which made the agency medium-size in terms of volume. Most of those

children had come from Romania or Russia, but now Tree

of Life was making inroads into Kazakhstan as well.

What caught the Carters' attention, however, was the agency's embrace of the Dakota issue.

"We've had a lot of families who have taken their children with them on

the trip," says Aviva Cohen, founder and executive director

of Tree of Life. "I think it's definitely more work for the adoptive

parents, unless the kids are over 8 or 9 years old.

"But it really makes it feel like a family experience. We personally

think it's a good idea for as many people as possible to be a part

of it."

Colin was stunned when, on his first phone call, a Tree of Life worker

asked if he wanted to view some videos of prospective

children. He was more stunned yet when three videos arrived the next

day, by overnight express.

But the real stunner was still coming. It showed up in the Carter

mailbox on May 4, four months after the family had launched its

bid for a daughter.

Olga.

* * *

"She's not starving, is she?" cracks Colin as Olga stands on an

examination table, showing off the rolls of baby fat around her thighs.

The video is 20 minutes long, and it allows Olga ample time to display

her cordial personality, her formidable motor skills and the

deep hue of her baby blues. Noreen and Colin have seen this show many

times, but they are locked in anyway, each grinning with

the unmistakable amusement and expectation of ... well, a parent.

"We loved it the minute we saw it," Noreen said. "She's really active.

She's very pretty. I have to say that, physically, she really

appealed to me. She's just the age that I wanted; some of those other

girls are little people already, but she still looks babyish. And

I like the fact that she doesn't have a language yet."

At the Carters' request, Tree of Life sent a copy of Olga's video to Dr.

Julia Bledsoe, a Seattle pediatrician who specializes in

scanning adoption videos for hints of serious medical problems. On a

frequent basis, Bledsoe has had to shatter the glee of adoptive

parents with some heartbreaking news.

But not this time. That bowlegged gait isn't rickets. Those motor skills

are indeed above average. Olga's social skills, including her

awareness of the camera, were all thumbs-up.

"I've got to tell you," Bledsoe said upon phoning the Carters, "this is

a great referral."

Noreen and Colin were overjoyed. On Mother's Day, their own mothers were treated to something special: a copy of Olga's video.

At her home in Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada, Colin's mom drove the

video around town and insisted that all of her family

members sit down to watch it.

Still, the Carters were strangely hesitant. Something about Ed and

Peri's experience, about their own rocky path to this moment,

made it difficult to take the plunge. Tree of Life was asking for $9,000

up front (WPA had opted for installments), but that wasn't

the problem.

The Carters slowly realized that they were looking for guarantees that

no one could give them. Guarantees that there wouldn't be a

paperwork screw-up, that Kazakhstan wouldn't shut down adoptions, that

Dakota would indeed be able to travel with them. A

guarantee that Olga would, in the end, wind up as part of their family.

For days, they weighed and contemplated. All the while, Olga's picture

stared back at them from the refrigerator door. Finally, on

May 17 - nearly two weeks after receiving Olga's video - they took a

deep breath, wrote out the check and mailed the contract.

If all goes well, their paperwork from the Immigration and

Naturalization Service will be back soon. Then a travel call will come.

The little girl on the fridge could be walking bowlegged through their

living room by August, before the fall semester begins.

"I'd say, yes, we're hugely relieved," Noreen said, days before the

couple signed the contract. "There's still some questions about

Tree of Life. But really, in the end, they're an agency. We've talked to

people who have used them. They do Kazakhstan. People

do come home with children. We found a child that we're extremely,

extremely interested in. I don't think we're going to continue

worrying about our relationship with the agency.

"I think we're going to dive in."

* * *

The Bee's Don Bosley can be reached at (916) 321-1101 or

dbosley@sacbee.com.

2001 Jun 3