kerrys question
Can you please go into more detail about the difference between a "Missing Child" and one that's been "Abducted for Adoption"?
Please bare with me because these boards are sending me doolally. Right kerry, I tried to reply to you question (the above) as a reply but couldnt copy pictures so Im having to put it in a blog. Plus dont know how to do quote so above is your quote (hope you understood that, not sure I did).
I really struggled about how and even if I should answer this question. Not because its a bad question but because of where it leads. Here goes. When I discovered the truth about my own adoption and the fact that basically I had with the help of a family member been stolen (something I am still struggling to deal with) I naturally started trying to find out how such a thing could happen. How could a child just be taken from its mother and never returned and why would no one question it. If my mum loved me and never got over losing me like she said then how could she have let it happen. All sounded bullshit to me. If a family member spirited away one of my kids there is no way I would accept it. like I said bullshit all of it. It didnt take me too long to find out how and why it could happen and that what I believed bullshit was sadly not as uncommon as you would have thought.
my mother was a single pregnant catholic girl and like many unwed mums in them days (1965) without support keeping the child was not an option. My mum was the youngest of a very large family and her mum had died in childbirth with her. Her Dad from what I can gather was a waste of space till the day he died when she was 8. The eldest brother became head of the house. A strict catholic, never missed a mass, went to confessions and got pissed on whiskey with the priest every week. A typical liverpool dockers life. When he found out my mum was pregnant he said he wasnt having no little bastard under his roof or in the family. when she was still pregnant with me he told her he had found someone to take me and she agreed (she told me she didnt feel she had any choice) . She said he wasnt someone you would argue with and thats just how things where then. She gave me away at ten days old but went and got me back the next day. For the next three years he made her life hell even though she married and was pregnant with my brother. She said he only ever refered to me as the little bastard and would spit on the ground if I was near him. They lived with him and his wife and their 5 kids. When she had my brother things got that bad she had a break down and was taken into hospital. Her husband had to work and the brother said he could only leave my brother with his wife when he went to work but he couldnt leave me. It was decided in the end that I would go and stay with the people who originally where going to have me just till my mum came home from hospital. She said she thought it was a kind offer and her husband could still go to work, my brother would be looked after and they could get the money together for a place of their own as soon as she was well.
My mum came home from hospital only to be told not to bother going to get me because I had long gone (my adop family moved house with me!). She went to the police told them her brother had given me away. The photo copy of the incident report I eventually got last year says (writing not too clear) After speaking to (mothers name) family members and the family priest satisfied child menntioned above is safe and wll with natural father. Mother is known to have long history of mental problems. Well she certainly did after that. My adop family along with her brother later went on to concoct a story and applied for adoption by mutual consent (without my mum knowing, wont bore you with any more details).
I know I waffled on a bit but if that was today that would answer the question about abduction for adoption. A missing child in my own mind would be a child who had randomly disapeared with foul play suspected. Just my own opinion. Today however, things arent quite the same. Children are still abducted to order for the purpose of selling on for illegal adoption. Now though it is through corrupt governments and profiteers. Their is a much bigger and far more sinister child abduction racket happening now and adoption into familieshas turned into adoption into child porn industry.
Denise Pipitone, who was kidnapped 01-09-2004, at Mazara Del Vallo in the province of Trapani in Sicily. http://briansdreams.com/MISSING/publicr/537.htm shows many photos for viewers to see. Is this the same child seen on the 18th October 2004 in milan? 2007 is this Denise? Denises mother?
Whether it is Denise Pipitone in these images or not, It is certainly someones little girl. A child that is being used as a sex slave.
You may not remember the name Johhny Gosch; however, he was one of the very first missing children to ever be placed on a milk carton in the 1980’s.
Johnny’s disappearance triggered nationwide fears of child abductions. He was one of the first faces of missing or abducted children to appear on milk cartons across the country.
Two photographs were left at the door of Noreen Gosch of her son, Johnny Gosch, who was abducted and has been missing for 24 years. The pictures were of Johnny Grosh, 12, and two other boys who were gaged and had their hands bound.
The old photos appear to show 12-year-old Johnny Gosch with his mouth gagged and his hands and feet tied. The boy is wearing the same sweatpants Johnny was wearing when he disappeared while delivering newspapers on the morning of Sept. 5, 1982, his mother said.
For someone to abduct a 12 year old boy is sick. For someone to send a picture of the missing abducted boy some 24 years later to the boy’s mother boards on cruel and twisted vile insanity.
Gosch said investigators confirmed the photos were authentic and likely taken within “hours or days” of the abduction. She said they were checking for fingerprints that could lead them to the source and possibly a breakthrough in a case that has long baffled authorities. The other boys in the photo were unidentified.
Meanwhile, others connected to the case have reported receiving the photographs through anonymous deliveries and the Internet.
Noreen Gosch had believed that her son was taken by child pornographers.
Gosch believes her son was taken by child pornographers. She told authorities he briefly contacted her in 1997 but feared for his life and declined to give details about where he was. She believes his abductors got him involved in crimes, which is why he is hiding his identity.
(CNN)
AGE PROGRESSION, 12 TO 35
In 1984, Gosch’s photograph appeared alongside that of Juanita Rafela Estavez on milk cartons across America; they were the first two abducted children to have their plights publicized in this way.
National Center for Missing and Exploited Poster with age progression.
http://missingexploited.com/category/internet/page/2/
I dont think I need to post any more cases here I think this gives a clear Idea of how times have changed. It seems someone will always find a use for somebody elses child. Thats it I have had enough it took hours to put a few pics in I will smash my pc if I try and get the rest to show. I am not posting anything longer than 4 lines with no pictures ever again!