Six Words: 'Black Babies Cost Less To Adopt'

June 27, 2013 / NPR

Americans adopt thousands of children each year. And as the nation has become increasingly diverse, and with the growth of international adoption in recent decades, many of those children don't look like their adoptive parents. That intersection of race and adoption has prompted many people to submit their six words to The Race Card Project, including this submission from a Louisiana woman: "Black babies cost less to adopt."

Other contributors have also addressed the skin-color based fee structure for many adoptions, including Caryn Lantz of Minneapolis. Her six words: "Navigating world as transracial adopted family."

Lantz and her husband, both white, are the adoptive parents of two African-American boys. The couple had struggled for years to conceive a child. When they finally decided to turn to adoption they were willing to adopt kids of another race. But they were concerned by what they discovered about the differential costs.

Lantz says she remembers a phone call with an adoption agency social worker. "And [she] was telling us about these different fee structures that they had based on the ethnic background of the child. And ... they also had, sort of a different track for adoptive parents."

Moving through the process would be quicker if the family was open to adopting an African-American (not biracial) child, the social worker explained to her. "And that is because they have children of color waiting," Lantz says. Adopting biracial, Latino, Asian or Caucasian children could be a slower process, she was told, because there were more parents waiting for them.

"And I remember hearing this and just sort of being dumbfounded that they would sort of segregate — to use a loaded term — segregate these children by ethnic background before they were even in this world," Lantz says. "That's when I started realizing that, OK, being a parent to a child of a different ethnic background — this is gonna be some work. There's going to be a lot of work on our end in order to be successful parents and to get our child ready for this world."

The Race Card Project spoke with social workers, adoption agencies and adoptive parents about adoption costs based on ethnicity. We discovered that this is not widely talked about, but it is common, Norris tells NPR's David Greene. "No one is comfortable about this."

Non-white children, and black children, in particular, are harder to place in adoptive homes, Norris says. So the cost is adjusted to provide an incentive for families that might otherwise be locked out of adoption due to cost, as well as "for families who really have to, maybe have a little bit of prodding to think about adopting across racial lines."

In other words, Norris explains, there are often altruistic reasons for the discrepancy — "but people who work in adoption say there's one more reason, quite simply: It's supply and demand."

The fees typically cover administrative costs, but also costs associated with taking care of the mother, like travel, rent, health care and counseling services. Now, some states and agencies are using a different formula to make adoption more affordable for families, with a sliding scale based on income rather than skin color. In that system, lower-income families pay less to adopt. Some agencies are also moving toward a uniform cost system where all adoptive parents would pay the same fees.

Ultimately, the Lantz family adopted their sons from Nevada, where the sliding scale was based on income, not race. But because they were eager to find a child, they did consider agencies that used a race-based cost differential.

During the process, the family received four calls about potential children to be matched with them — three from states that used this race-based cost structure. "One was a full African-American child, one was a biracial child and one was a white child," Lantz says. "And when they told me the fees for the white child, I was in a Babies R Us [store] and I remember having to sit down in the aisle and say to myself, 'I don't think we can afford to adopt this child if the expectant mother chose us.' "

The cost to adopt the Caucasian child was approximately $35,000, plus some legal expenses. "Versus when we got the first phone call about a little girl, a full African-American girl, it was about $18,000," Lantz says. The cost for adoption of a biracial child was between $24,000 and $26,000.

Eyes do linger on her blended family in her community, Lantz says, and curious people make comments. Two years ago, before she had a second son, she started growing concerned about the effect those comments might have on her son as he grows older.

"I am a little nervous about what we're gonna do when he starts to understand why someone approached us at Target and thanked us for saving babies," she explained at the time. "Or when a woman, you know, walks down the aisle of the grocery store and says, 'What's he mixed with?' "

Lantz responded to that incident, she recalls, by saying, "My son, we adopted him at birth. And, you know, his ethnic background is a little different. And we don't know a whole bunch about it, but he is a beautiful kid, isn't he?"

NPR continues a series of conversations about The Race Card Project, where thousands of people have submitted their thoughts on race and cultural identity in six words. Every so often NPR Host/Special Correspondent Michele Norris will dip into those six-word stories to explore issues surrounding race and cultural identity for Morning Edition. You can find hundreds of six-word submissions and submit your own at


"How much did it cost to buy me?"

I remember when I was little, I'd ask my Adad, "How much did I cost?"

My Adad would get furious at me for my perception of adoption.  I don't know why.  I mean, I knew I was adopted.  In turn, given the circumstances behind my adoption, using a modicum of logic, I believed I was purchased, through a company, by two people who could no longer have kids.  The concept of being bought was no big deal to me.  I simply wanted to know how much it cost to buy me from another country.

My Adad never gave me an answer.

My APs also kept many of my adoption documents hidden from me.

In the above article, a link leads to the original submission alerting others about the price-discrepancy found in privately-run adoption agencies running in Adoptionland. 

The mother ended her post with the following:

My son was cheaper than if he’d been white. How will he feel, if he ever finds out about that?

While I myself cannot answer for another adoptee with a whole future-childhood ahead of him, I can, however, answer as one who was abused and then cast-away by my own "forever family".  If I found out my adoption cost less than those around me, I would think so much would make sense about the final outcome.  It would become clear to me the agency got what it wanted, (the money), without any thought or care about me.  And no doubt, I would wonder why my APS chose then to be so cheap and impatient about something so critically important, as the life and future of a child in-very-special-need.

One last thing... for those just learning about how fishy the adoption industry can be -- I used to think a non-profit adoption agency meant no one was making a profit or salary through the business/trade being done.  Not true, as we here at PPL learned.  In fact, there are many financial perks that go with the not-for-profit label, especially for those with fancy titles.  SO... if PAPs think the upper echelon found within an adoption agency/service are NOT receiving anual perks and salaries from each adoption completed, please think again. 

"One was a full African-American child"

One was a full African-American child

Oh dear, NPR. At this, I must laugh.

What in the world is a "full African-American child" in a country that had one-drop rules as the law of the land?

Those laws were never static - even wikipedia mentions VA's Racial Integrity Act of 1924, the product of American eugenics, went much further than previous race-purity laws - . Virginia was far from the only state to do this -- California was equally as heinous, though not nearly as notorious (we Californians are a little better at erasing our rather nasty history of discrimination and segregation.) These kinds of acts were the basis for legalized discrimination by race for so long and the legacy still shows up in these adoption practices.

Then, in the same year, you get blanket termination of immigration from just about every country due east of Turkey, which lasted until 1965.

I have often wondered if, in 1911 when my Agrandmother was 20 years old, whether Arkansas reissued birth certificates to everyone previously deemed "colored" or "mulatto" and reclassified them as "negro". I doubt it, but still wonder.

Primary links

Pound Pup Legacy