
A "military brat" (also known as a "brat", "base brat", "army brat", "navy brat/junior", "marine brat/junior", "coast guard brat", or "air force brat") is a term for a person whose parent or parents have served full-time in the armed forces during the person's childhood. In conventional usage, the word "brat" used alone may be derogatory; in a military context, however, it is neither a subjective nor a judgmental term for most, and it is a term in which many in the military community are comfortable with. In the United Kingdom, the term "pad brat" is also used.
Although the term "military brat" is used in other English-speaking countries, only the United States has studied its military brats as an identifiable demographic. This group is shaped by frequent moves, absence of a parent, authoritarian family dynamics, strong patriarchal authority, the threat of parental loss in war, and the militarization of the family unit. While non-military families share many of these same attributes, military culture is unique due to the tightly knit communities that perceive these traits as normal. Although they did not choose to belong to it, military culture can have a long-term impact on brats.
As adults, military brats can share many of the same positive and negative traits developed from their mobile childhoods. Having had the opportunity to live around the world, military brats can have a breadth of experiences unmatched by most teenagers. Regardless of race, religion, nationality, or gender, brats might identify more with other highly mobile children than with non-mobile ones. A few can struggle to develop and maintain deep, lasting relationships, and can feel like outsiders to U.S. civilian culture, but most assimilate quickly and well as they have to do so with each move
You can find it HERE
Comments
forcing its own broken families
In a world of broken families, for the life of me, I cannot understand why the US won't sign the United Nation's Convention on The Right's of A Child, but then, given the US's history with declaring war on other nations, why would it sign such a promise to protect the rights of children when it's a country that can't even protect the rights of it's own people? After all, look what it does to it's own military families!
Adopters
Wow, that was an insightful post Neo.
A drink well deserved.
Hanging out here, reading posts and some of the articles I've come to realize adoption is in no way in a child's best interest and is only a legal practice that serves adoptive parents.
Adoption is not child-care!
Had my adoptive parents been care takers, instead of adopters, I would have respected them much more. I would have had a family I couldn't live with, but at least I had had people taking care of me. Instead they made me adopt, live a life in which I was supposed to be someone I was not.
damn, I'm getting all serious and angry again.
I need a drink too.