http://fixcas.com/news/2009/Myers.jpg
Boy Drugged to Death by CPS!!!
April 22, 2009
After Gabriel Myers was forcibly separated from his parents, Florida doctors prescribed a cocktail of four psychotropic drugs. Last week he hanged himself. Three of the drugs carried black-box safety warnings, useless for medication administered by force of arms. His death will be recorded as a suicide, but could just as well be called murder by drugs.
Broward child's suicide raises questions about medication
Gabriel Myers, the 7-year-old Broward boy who hanged himself in the shower of his foster home
BY CAROL MARBIN MILLER, cmarbin@MiamiHerald.com
Weeks before his death, Gabriel Myers, the 7-year-old Broward boy who hanged himself in the shower of his foster home, had been prescribed a powerful mind-altering drug linked by federal regulators to an increased risk of suicide in children.
In all, Gabriel had been prescribed four psychiatric drugs, two or three of which he was taking at the time of his death, said Jack Moss, Broward chief of the state Department of Children & Families. Moss said he is not sure which medications the boy was taking because Margate police took the foster home's medication log as part of an investigation into Gabriel's death last week.
Three of the psychotropic drugs carry U.S. Food and Drug Administration ''black box'' label warnings for children's safety, the strongest advisory the federal agency issues. Three of the medications are not approved for use with young children, though they are widely prescribed to youngsters ''off label'' -- meaning doctors can prescribe the drug even if not formally approved for that use.
In 2005 -- reacting to a series of stories in The Miami Herald that as many as one in four foster children were prescribed potentially dangerous mind-altering drugs -- state lawmakers approved a law aimed at curbing their use. Children's advocates now question whether the law is being ignored.
Gabriel was being treated by a Broward psychiatrist who is on a list of Florida doctors that the state Agency for Health Care Administration red-flagged as having ''problematic'' prescribing practices, said Robert Constantine, director of AHCA's Medicaid Drug Therapy Management Program, which tracks prescribing of psychiatric drugs to children.
The list flags doctors with a high volume of prescriptions of mental-health drugs or potentially dangerous combinations of the medications.
Dr. Sohail Punjwani has been on the list every quarter in which regulators have monitored the prescribing of psychotropic drugs since the program was created in 2006, said Constantine, a professor at the University of South Florida's Mental Health Institute. The practices of about 17,000 Florida doctors who prescribe medications to children on Medicaid are studied every quarter, and about 300 to 450 end up red-flagged on the list.
And though Florida law requires that either a parent or judge consent to the use of psychotropic drugs on foster children, a source with knowledge of the boy's case said Gabriel already had been taking a three-drug cocktail when Broward Circuit Judge Lisa Porter was informed at a March 11 hearing. The judge approved the medications over the objection of a court-appointed guardian, the source said.
''We are devastated,'' said Jon Myers, the boy's maternal uncle, who cared for him from June through October 2008. ``Gabriel's problems could not be solved by a pharmacy.''
Four feet tall and 67 pounds, with short-cropped brown hair, Gabriel was a bright, charming and often sweet little boy, those who knew him say.
But he already had a sad past hinting at a troubling future. Records obtained by The Miami Herald show Gabriel may have been molested by an older boy while he was living with grandparents in Ohio, while his mother was in jail.
On Thursday, Gabriel locked himself in a bathroom and hanged himself with a detachable shower head after arguing with the 19-year-old son of his foster dad about his lunch, Moss said.
DCF petitioned a judge on Tuesday to unseal the boy's records in response to requests from The Herald and other media, spokeswoman Leslie Mann said.
Punjwani told The Miami Herald that he is board certified as a child psychiatrist. He did not recall Gabriel, but Punjwani said he was part of a ''huge'' group practice and may have been one of many clinicians to treat the boy.
Punjwani defended the use of psychiatric drugs on children, even if they are not approved for such use, saying the lack of approval stems from the reluctance of drug makers and the medical establishment to launch clinical trials on children.
The anti-psychotic drugs, he added, are used routinely to treat mood instability and insomnia among children.
Gabriel originally had been prescribed Vyvanse, an attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder drug approved for kids aged 6 through 12, Lexapro, an anti-depressant which is not approved for children, and Zyprexa, an anti-psychotic drug that also is not approved for kids, said Moss.
Both Punjwani and Moss said they think the Lexapro and Zyprexa were discontinued in recent weeks, and that a drug called Symbyax -- which contains the medication in Zyprexa along with another antidepressant -- was substituted.
Symbyax, recently approved for severe depression, is among a group of commonly prescribed anti-depressants, such as Prozac and Paxil, that the FDA warned in 2003 were linked to an increase in ''suicidal thoughts or behaviors'' among children. Symbyax is not approved by the FDA for use on children.
Dr. David L. Katz, professor of public health at Yale University's medical school, called the use of such drugs on youngsters ''extremely risky,'' He questioned whether the boy needed to be taking such powerful medications absent a diagnosis of schizophrenia. ''These are medications that are potent and potentially dangerous,'' Katz said. ``They certainly are powerful drugs for anybody, let alone a 7-year-old boy.''
Jon Myers, the uncle who cared for Gabriel after abuse investigators found him in a car in a Denny's parking lot after his mother had passed out, questions whether Gabriel needed such potent medications to begin with.
Myers said the boy's pediatrician had discontinued all psychotropic drugs while Gabriel lived with him, and the boy did well, earning A's and B's at the Hollywood Christian Academy.
''We did not have any issues with him having tantrums,'' Myers said. ``He would get upset, like little boys do.''
A week or two before Gabriel died, his grandfather in Ohio expressed concerns that the boy sounded overmedicated. ''My father said that the last conversation he had a couple of weeks ago Gabriel sounded like he was too drugged,'' Myers said.
``He sounded like he was doped up.''
Source: Miami Herald
Comments
Governments, Please stop
Governments, Please stop killing us....
"7-year-old hung himself"
Does that make sense to any of you?
overmedicated...
I found myself over medicated on prescription Effexor ER, just last year. I know the effects these so-called depression-helpers have on innocent people. One day you wake up and look around and find yourself more depressed than before, and you feel like dying... I don't pretend to know what a child would think in this situation, but it can't be good. How can a child tell you what he is feeling emotionally when he is too young to know what emotions are good and which are dangerously bad? In the industry of drugs, children are being set up for the dangerous effects of drugs which could lead to death; only because I was an adult could I eventually recognize the danger and get myself off that damning drug. Maybe this is why we see children who don't want to take their medicines? I've seen it in foster care...
What did I ever do to deserve this... Teddy
Adult reactions
There are many many many websites dedicated to the horrors of certain prescription drugs. [See: Effexor withdrawl and Lexapro withdrawl, just to name two...] Yet I wonder, how many foster/adoptive parents know about these shared concerns and stories.... and how many of these parents really care about a drug's side effects on a child? I have read in some articles, it was the foster/adoptive parent asking the treating doctor to give MORE drugs because what was given was not really working as well as they wanted it to. It's quite sad, when you take the time to really think about it.
While I believe in certain situations, medication CAN be a life-saver, I also believe certain children are being treated like test-rats because no one is saying "no".
At this point, I'd like to show what's happening to those who were able to survive the very difficult years: Living with the legacy of care
when I fostered
I had no say over if the child would be on drugs or not... all kids over 3 had to go to therapy... all kids in therapy were seen usually by a psy dr, in the same office as the therapist for an eval... most kids left with a drug bottle... :( system is fucked up
It makes perfect sense...
IF you knew how certain connections work and operate within the child placement industry.
More about this latest victim can be found here: 7-year-old's hanging death investigated in Florida and here: Gabriel Myers. Other cases, related to overmedication, can be found here and here.
What does God think?...
The Child Placement Industry:
I come at everything from a "Christian" perspective because that is how I was raised and have lived. I want to ask this:
Isn't anyone in fear of the wrath of God? Even if you don't believe in God, are there no moral and ethical people
in the child-help industry? There is a scripture (Matthew 18) that states:
"but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a heavy millstone hung around his neck, and to be drowned in the depth of the sea."
Matthew 18:6 uses the word "sin" (NIV), Mark 9:42 uses the word "stumble" (NKJV) and Luke 17:2 (NKJV) uses the word "offend" to show how serious it is for a person to purposely try to abuse a spiritual child of God and if that is the penalty for causing a spiritual child to become offended, or sin or stumble then by extension this means a physical little child cannot be treated in this manner either or risk the same penalty. A millstone is very heavy and if it is around someone's neck that person will die when thrown into a sea. God takes this offense very seriously.
America is headed from some deep trouble.
ADDED: I went to youtube and watched several videos on EffexorER. What I know now is that at 225mg a day, I was being poisoned. I felt nothing. I could not respond emotionally. I was a zombie. WHAT could this be doing to children?
My daughter wants children... she has been on medication for depression for 3 years. I feel the need to share with her the information here. Thank you for providing the truth.
What did I ever do to deserve this... Teddy
They Just Don't Care
The government tells kids in school to say no to drugs while they drug kids in their care. I was in fostercare, and given drugs such as prozac even though that was linked to suicides. Let me just say I had never taken them I'am not saying how I hid it but I never trust anyone other than my family. These people are legal kidnappers, and want you for more money. What these kids really need is love, and to be listened to. They are not adults but they have feelings, and someone should be listening to what they have to say in order to make the situation better. Not one time did a caseworker ever come to me and say what can I do in order to make things better, and happier for you. They just make decisions against your will, and ofter their decisions result in bodily harm, death, and emotional damage. If you would not give cold medicines to children why give them psychotic drugs?
[Sad empathetic nod]
I myself find the whole "Just say no" campaign a bit silly considering ADHD drugs are known to act like amphetamines.
However, I do recognize there ARE some cases... there ARE situations... where medication IS necessary. [I had a friend in college who was bi-polar, and if she was not on her medication, she was scary... and she knew it.] But is "the need to medicate children" as necessary as we are led to believe? I'm not so sure.
I wholeheartedly believe love, in it's most purest form, CAN do miracles. The question is, how many put in-care are given love and how many are simply given poor substitutes? Never will I believe a pill can replace the power of one really good person. Call me crazy, but that's simply how I think.
It saddens me every time I read about a child ignored by those paid to protect. No... it sickens me.
cure vs. lifelong treatment
I think when talking about medication it's important to make the distinction between drugs that are used as a cure (eg. antibiotics) and those that are used as a lifelong treatment (eg. anti-depressants, anti-psychotics). While the first category of drug can still be dangerous and can be wrongly prescribed, there are no real benefits for anyone to do so. With lifelong treatments there is an inherent risk that the prescription is either done to make profit of it (read pharmaceutical industry and affiliates) or to sedate people so handling them becomes more easily. Especially in residential settings: foster care group homes, residential treatment centers, but also in nursing homes and prisons, staff may find their job a lot easier when the people in their care are chemical zombies.
Long-term use
Even with antibiotics, there comes a point where the body can become resistant. (And believe it or not, antibiotics are often over-prescribed for children with ear infections because of the psychological benefit it gives some parents.)
Personally, I have always seen "medicine' as being palliative or preventative, not necessarily curative.
Jon Myers
''We are devastated,'' said Jon Myers, the boy's maternal uncle, who cared for him from June through October 2008. ``Gabriel's problems could not be solved by a pharmacy.''
Gabriel's uncle Jon Myers is a registered sex offender:
http://offender.fdle.state.fl.us/offender/flyer.do?personId=62488
Please reopen this investigation. You've made a serious mistake. There's no way a seven year old would do this to himself.
More info here:
http://imgur.com/EmJ.jpg
Are you sure?
I not at all sure if the Jon Myers mentioned in the article is the same person you found in the sex-offenders registry. Jon Myers is Gabriel Myers maternal uncle. Given they share the same last name with Gabriel Myers mother, Candace Myer, this uncle, therefore is most likely Gabriel's mother's brother, Of course there is some chance Candace had a sister who married a man with the same last name, but that is not all that likely.
The man on the sex offenders registry is black and Gabriel is white. So unless this Jon Myers is the black adopted brother of Candace, it is most unlikely these two persons are the same. In this article, Jon's wife is mentioned and she is called Liz. Now running these facts through the white page reveals there is a Jonathon B Meyers living in Plantation, Fl, who has a wife Elizabeth W Meyers. The person on the sex offenders registery is called Jonathon A Meyers.
Aren't these the things...
that we should all do? SEARCH the past to find the truth? I do admire anonymous' search and concern... and I do agree with you, it probably isn't the same guy.
BUT, if I had done some searching on my husband that I knew for three weeks before marrying, maybe there would have been enough to scare me off.
Going on face value and that everyone in town thought he was a nice guy, I was totally deceived about his past. And now, here I am after 32 years piecing together the things I know with the things I'm finding out, with his confessions, and I've found a pedophile.
PEOPLE! Dig deep before making a mistake.
What did I ever do to deserve this... Teddy
""7-year-old hung
""7-year-old hung himself"
Does that make sense to any of you?"
As I said something just ain't right about that.
Oddly you are correct, he is on the registry. Will try to get confirmation that the name on the list and this individual are indeed one in the same. Best to be objective.
I will let you know my results.
Not the same person
Last week the Florida Department for Children and Families released a report about Gabriel Meyers, in which the uncle Jonathon Meyers is said to be born June 1, 1958. The sex offender by the same name (though having a different middle name) was born August 2, 1985.
The Sytem Needs A Change I Don't Think Obama Changing Anything
I hope they get sued, and shut down. There needs to be a new system with less government involvement. We need to stop picking the same people in government, and run ourselves.
Government size
While I agree the system needs a change and I also believe the Obama administration is not going to change much if anything, at least not in this term, I also believe less government involvement is not the ultimate solution to this.
Some of the problems that arise in the child welfare system stem from the way it is funded. Both foster care and adoption assistance are partially paid for by Title IV-E grants provided by the federal government to the states as part of the Social Security Act. These grants are open ended, so the more children a state keeps in the system, the more federal money they receive. As a result the various Departments of Social Services (or any other name those state agencies go by) have a financial insentive to put children in foster care and expensive interventions such as residential treatment tend to prevail.
The issue here is not that there is too much government, but that the ones spending the money don't have to acquire the money. It's very much like spending other people's money. At the same time the federal oversight over the money spent is lax, although some states have performed so poorly the federal government did intervene.
It is ironic that the call for less government helped create some of the issues we now encounter. In the late 1970's, the foster care system was about as big as it is now, which called for action at the time. As a result the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act (AACWA) was created, which focused on the issue of permanency. This law tried to address both the large number of children in the foster care system and the bouncing of children within the foster care system. Permanency was thought of in two directions: adoption (when return to the biological family was impossible) and family preservation (when assistance to the family would solve the issues encountered by CPS).
AACWA had two weaknesses. It created funding for adoption, when it didn't do the same for family preservation and it didn't properly define the so-called "reasonable efforts clause". The latter refers to the obligation to the state to make a reasonable effort to preserve families before terminating parental rights. As a result the obligation to make reasonable efforts to preserve families has become a check box on a form, which always gets crossed. To make matters worse, the Supreme Court in Suter et al. v Artist, decided that reasonable efforts could not be enforced, basically rendering it futile.
Still AACWA was highly successful for a couple of years. The foster care population saw significant reduction after the law was signed, yet after some three or four years the federal government decided to reduce its control over the states and the situation quickly returned to the state it had been in before the law was instituted.
So while less government calls for less interference in the lives of families, it can in reality lead to more interference.
An interesting question could be if federal funding of foster care should be stopped altogether so the states have to pay for it themselves. That would certainly reduce some of the incentives to remove children too quickly, but it would also make child welfare highly dependent on the state budget. For the federal government the funding of foster care is a relative small portion of the total budget, but for the state it would be significant. So if a state would end up in a budgetary crises, such as California is in now, it could mean the budget for child protective services and foster care would be slashed so much, children are effectively no longer being protected by the government.
Another argument for federal funding has to do with equal standards. Now more affluent areas, through payroll taxes, contribute more to the child welfare system than poor areas. As a result, the funding of child protective services and foster care is more equally spread over the country than it would be if every state would have to pay for it themselves. There is a fairness to this, since children have not asked to be born and certainly not in a specific area.
As much as it is a falacy that the government does a good job taking care of children, it is also a falacy that families always do a good job. Children are mistreated in the foster care system as many of our pages demonstrate, but families can be a horrible place for a child too. If child protective services and foster care would be eliminated it would certainly benefit those children who'd been wrongfully removed, but at the same time it would keep other children in an abusive situation. By ending CPS and foster care, the call not to interfere in families would immediately be replaced by a call to the government to protect children.
The problem, as I see it, has not so much to do with too much government or too little, nor are child protective services fundamentally wrong, but the problem lies in their application. The system is badly run in many places. Much of that has to do with financial incentives to keep as many children in care as possible for the highest cost achievable. This is the job of state officials to counter. Unfortunately in many states they are affiliated with, sponsored by those private organizations that reap most of the benefits of child welfare funding. It's telling that in the state of Michigan, despite a report from a committee instituted by the state itself, which concludes too many children are taken into care, the director of the Department of Human Services has further cut the budget for family preservation, while increasing the per diems for foster care organizations.
The big issue I see is not so much the size of the government but a lack of seperation between public and private interests. Public interests are defined by law and state reasonable intentions, keeping children safe, while not interfering in families when not necessary. Private interests usually are monetary or religious in nature and often those two go hand in hand. If public officials neglect their obligation to the public and instead rub elbows with the private sector, the result is the corrupt, malfunctioning child welfare system we see in many states.