New York Child Sexual Abuse Law Could Allow More Adult Victims to File Lawsuits
Submitted by Kerry on Thu, 2009-03-12 23:04.
See also:
- Civil suit charts history of church abuse in county
- The Effects of a False Allegation of Child Sexual Abuse on an Intact Middle Class Family
- Archbishop told abuse victim to 'go to hell': report
- Irish bishop in child sex abuse row steps aside
- Purgatory
- Canadian Prelate Quits In Clerics' Sex Scandal
- Church Loses Fight Over Sealed Papers
- Sex abuse rife in other religions, says Vatican
- Catholic Church turned a blind eye as thousands of children were sexually abused by priests in Ireland, says official report
- £5m claim over 'sex abuse by priest'
March 12, 2009 / News Inferno
The New York state legislature could soon make it possible for many adult victims of child sexual abuse to file civil suits against their abusers, as well as any institution that enabled that abuse. According to The New York Times, a law that would extend the deadline victims have for filing child abuse lawsuits could finally become law sometime this year.
The law - called the Child Victims Act - has been proposed before, but never passed. According to The New York Times, Republicans in the state Senate had always been able to block the bill. But, the Democrats now control the legislature. What’s more, the Times said Gov. David Paterson is a proponent of the act, and would likely sign it if it is passed.
Currently, the deadline for bringing such a lawsuit is 5 years after a victim turns 18. According to The New York Times, the Child Victims Act would give victims a one-year exemption from the statute of limitations. Regardless of how long ago the alleged abuse occurred, they could file suit in civil court. At the year’s end, time limits on such claims would be restored, but with a wider window: Instead of a five-year period after turning 18, victims would have 10 years to file claims, the Times said
As it is written now, the Child Victims Act would only apply to lawsuits filed against private institutions and individuals. This is mainly because of legal protections granted under existing state law to all public workers and agencies. According to the Times, critics of the act have argued that this unfairly discriminates against religious institutions and private schools. But proponents of the Child Victims Act have said that the disparity could be addressed in future legislation.
Those who support the bill are hoping to provide an avenue for victims of abuse some avenue of recourse. According to The New York Times, the Child Victims Act was inspired by the clergy abuse scandals in the Roman Catholic Church over the past decade. Critics of the Church have accused its hierarchy of enabling the abuse. In some instances, abusive priests were allowed to torment children for decades. Often, this occurred because those guilty of abuse were simply moved from parish to parish to keep allegations quiet. When the abuse scandals surfaced, hundreds of victims in New York found they could not bring suit against the Church and its officials because of the statute of limitations.
According to The New York Times, several other states have passed similar laws. Such a measure has allowed the adult victims of child sexual abuse at the hands of Roman Catholic clergy to win between $800 million to $1 billion in damages and settlements, the Times said.
- Add new comment
- 1864 reads
A closer look at laws, lawyers and those with strong voices
I have a very dear friend who is a lawyer. Jokes are often made about his career choice because he's paid to defend people caught doing criminal activity. Although we don't discuss actual cases, we do discuss the nature of people and evidence presented in a court-room. If there's one thing my friend knows, it's not all things are as they seem to be. [My friend was abused when he was a child... needless to say, my friend is a hero in my harsh and critical eyes.]
This morning, an update was made on a post that was put on our pages late yesterday. We got a written complaint from a lawyer, telling us certain written information had to be removed because we were spreading lies started by a certain woman. In fact, we at PPL get many letters written by lawyers, telling us to remove certain pieces because it can damage/ruin certain jobs/professions. [Imagine, certain lawyers find it disturbing to have articles linking their name to topics like "child trafficking" and "pedophiles"!]
I suppose there are many law makers, lawyers and various professional people, (including members of the clergy), who wish very large groups of people would take a pill that completely erases parts of our memory. After all, wouldn't it be nice if none of us had a past that had the potential to haunt or destroy new (future) opportunities?
Today I read a blog-post written by a lawyer in New York. Although I do enjoy a good feeding frenzy on those caught with their pants down, I also like to feature people who seem to work for the good of humanity. I will include his written piece, so others can decide if we, "the little people", need more lawyers working for the victims of poor choices made within "family and child services".