Here's for you Neophyte

Niels's picture

Though I know our bartender?!? section is intended to be a refuge of folly amidst a flow of grave and serious posts, today I would like to bring the two together and in all earnest present the twelve steps of Alcoholic Anonimous, to point out the obvious, the flagrant over-reprentation of religion in social services and in fact in all nooks and crannies of American Society.

In our Child Placement group we have discussed the influence of religion on child placement in various places and while that is already a far too large industry, it dwarfs in comparison to money involved in the various 12-step programs. I can't phrase it better than Charles Bufe does in the forword of Resisting 12-Step Coercion so I leave with this gentleman's words.

As Stanton Peele notes in his Preface, there are myriad avenues by which individuals are forced into 12-step alcohol and drug treatment, and into 12-step groups such as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and Narcotics Anonymous (NA). The total number of such persons is in excess of 1,000,000 annually, and is likely closer to 1,500,000. Given that approximately 2,000,000 persons are treated annually in the United States, this means that a majority of those treated are coerced into it, as are a majority of newcomers to AA and NA.

What seems to have escaped general notice is that, given the number of those treated, if treatment were anywhere near as effective as treatment advocates claim, the number of alcohol abusers in this country would have plummeted to near zero over the last two decades that is, in the period when 12-step treatment was instituted on a mass scale in this country. Yet the treatment of literally tens of millions of Americans has had no discernible effect on the rate of alcohol abuse in the United States.

This is hardly surprising given the nature of the great bulk of treatment. Well over 90% of treatment facilities in this country are 12- step facilities, and, as we'll see, the treatment they provide consists primarily of religious indoctrination. As Chapter 3 shows, the religiosity of the 12-step approach is so obvious that it's amazing that anyone would deny it. Yet 12-step groups and individuals routinely and vehemently deny it, asserting that their program is "spiritual, not religious."

This denial of the obvious began at the time that AA separated itself from its parent Protestant evangelical group, the Oxford Group Movement. The motive then was to sidestep a possible ban by the Catholic hierarchy on Catholic participation in AA. That concern has long passed, but most AA members remain in deep denial about the religious nature of AA.

At present, there are two primary reasons for this. The first is that the vast majority of AA members are ignorant of both the history of their organization and of what constitutes religion. As well, they're members of a very anti-intellectual organization in which questioning is considered a "disease symptom," and in which great emphasis is placed on unquestioning acceptance. (Two of the most popular AA slogans are "Utilize, don't analyze," and "Let go and let God.") So, most AA members hear the "spiritual, not religious" assertion at meetings and repeat it in parrot-like fashion.

The many AA members who own and staff 12-step treatment facilities, as well as those who staff AA's educational and medical front groups, have an additional motivation: money. Treatment is a multi- billion-dollar industry, and the honest admission that AA (and all other 12-step groups and treatment) is religious in nature would seriously jeopardize their access to that river of government and insurance industry cash.

The end result of all this is that ineffective, expensive religious indoctrination in the guise of treatment continues to be the norm in this country; at least tens if not hundreds of thousands of 12-step group members many with little training beyond AA or NA membership are employed in the treatment industry; many others, who own the treatment facilities, have profited handsomely; AA's good name as a voluntaristic organization has been severely tarnished; and the tens of billions of dollars spent over the last quarter century on 12-step treatment have had no discernible effect on the rate of alcohol abuse.

Another ugly truth is that AA true believers have largely managed to block forms of treatment that are both inexpensive and have good scientific evidence of efficacy. This continues to this very day, and is especially true of controlled-drinking therapies. In fact, 12-step professionals routinely vilify and blackball other professionals who dare to question 12-step orthodoxy, and especially those who have the courage to try to establish alternative treatment programs. There have been many ugly incidents of 12-steppers attacking controlled-drinking researchers, advocates, and clinicians with the cry, "They're killing people!" What makes this most ironic is that the large bulk of the scientific studies with control or comparison groups indicate that 12- step groups and treatment are themselves quite ineffective in dealing with alcohol and drug problems.

One of the reasons for this demonization of controlled drinking advocates (and of those who advocate decriminalization or legali- zation of drugs) is the demonization of alcohol and other drugs in 12- step ideology. Twelve-steppers do not regard drinking and drug problems as mere behavioral problems which individuals can through hard work and persistence learn to overcome. Rather, in AA and all other 12-step groups, substance-abusing individuals are presented as powerless in themselves to deal with their problems; and the substances they abuse are presented as powerful. Perhaps the clearest example of this is found in Alcoholics Anonymous, AA's "Big Book," in which alcoholics are presented (in step 1 among other places) as "powerless," while alcohol is presented as "cunning, baffling, powerful!" (Wilson, 1939, 1976, pp. 58 59).

The effect of this demonization is threefold: 1) It at least partially absolves substance abusers from responsibility for their actions ("I couldn't help it I'm an alcoholic and the alcohol made me do it!"); 2) It discourages individuals from trying to overcome their own problems by presenting those problems as insoluble (without the direct intervention of God), and so could well serve to increase the number and severity of drug and alcohol problems; and 3) By presenting substances as evil and powerful, it provides the rationale for authoritarian governmental intrusion in the lives of individuals (who might easily fall prey to these evil, "cunning" substances).

This third effect has led (at least in part) to the so-called War on Drugs. This war has greatly increased government intervention in the lives of individuals, has grossly eroded civil liberties, has cost easily several hundred billion dollars (and likely over a trillion) over the last few decades, and has resulted in the imprisonment of millions of individuals who hurt no one for consensual "crimes" involving substances far less dangerous than alcohol or tobacco.

A great irony of this war on victimless crimes is that it has resulted in an increase in real crimes crimes with victims. By greatly driving up the price of drugs, the government has ensured that addicts will need large amounts of cash to purchase drugs thus ensuring vast amounts of property crime (which some blame on drugs rather than on government prohibition, ignoring the fact that outright addicts of such highly addictive drugs as nicotine and methadone don't commit property crimes to support their habits due to the low cost of their legal drugs).

One doubts that this was what Bill Wilson had in mind when he set the ball rolling by describing individuals as "powerless" and alcohol as "cunning, baffling, powerful!" But it's what he wrought.

Those who originally promoted the 12-step concept of alcoholism and addiction (in medical guise, the "disease concept of alcoholism/ addiction") were quite probably well intentioned; they likely wanted to replace moralistic judgment of alcoholics and addicts with medical compassion for the "diseased." But their efforts have resulted in disaster for the nation incredible expense, an utterly ineffective approach to addictions, and millions of ruined lives. In the face of all this, 12-steppers continue to assert despite a great deal of contrary evidence that their approach is the only way to deal with addictions. And a great many of them, shamefully, now advocate and willingly participate in the mass coercion of their fellow citizens into what were once proudly voluntaristic religious healing programs.

There is some good news, though. In recent years, several appeal- level courts have ruled that AA and other 12-step groups are religious in nature, and that the state's coercing individuals into attending such groups is a violation of the "Establishment Clause" of the First Amendment. The Supreme Court recently refused to hear the appeal of two such cases, so there is no Supreme Court decision on the subject (that is, there is no national binding precedent), and there isn't likely to be one any time soon. This means that reform will proceed piecemeal across the country, as those who advocate, order, and participate in coerced 12-step participation are quite unlikely to abandon their use of coercion until forced to do so.

Thus change will come only when individuals stand up for their rights. This book is dedicated to those brave individuals. And it is dedicated to giving them the information they need to successfully resist 12-step coercion.

Comments

"It works if you work it, so

"It works if you work it, so work it and live".  Provided you continue to go guilt-ridden, shame-inspired and under the power and influence of those who think linking with reformed drinkers/smokers, and takers is in your best interest!

My personal favorite is the new twist on an old gimmick, called Emotions Anonymous.  That's for people who have problems dealing with their emotions and think being neurotic is a big social no-no.  (Yes, God FORBID any of us have emotions!!!) 

Isn't this all a baby-step from living in a Stepford community where everyone lives the same lives, doing the same things so no diversity exists for anyone?

I'd like to know when the prescription pill-popping group will be formed so all us depressed bastards can toss our medications in a bomb-fire like women did away with their bras in the 1960's!

Alcoholism

It could be very difficult to describe the real meaning of the word-alcoholism! What can be confusing about alcoholism is the fact that some adults seem to be able to enjoy it occasionally with no problems. Other people, though, can become alcoholics. Who is an alcoholic? It is simple- an alcoholic is someone whose mind and body crave alcohol which has little control over his or her drinking and can't stop without help. It is proven that a person who starts drinking alcohol at a young age is more likely to become an alcoholic. It often gets worse with years because the person may start experiencing health problems related to drinking.

___________________
Marvin

This is a comprehensive addiction portal focusing on topics of alcohol and drug abuse. http://www.alcoholaddiction.org

No dope to dopamine

I'm one of those "followers" who believes that hormones are the basis of our beings, so all actions and reactions relate to the ultimate chemical-manufacturing machine, The Brain.  Funny how people tend to forget the mind is far more there mere mortal thoughts and opinions, as the brain itself is what regulates each and every system within our bodies.  [Homeostais]

I found a very insightful sight that discusses Dopamine and Addiction, as the following offers an example of what others think about the role certain hormones have in our personal drives for release, relief and pleasure.

Dan F. Umanoff, M.D. 

All drugs of addiction (and addictive behaviors) and only these ultimately stimulate dopamine release or increase its activity in the nucleus accumbens, the same way electrical current in rats, monkeys, and humans does, and cause dopamine release throughout the brain, and produce the hedonic response . The hedonic responses to these addictors are: I like that, motivation, incentive stimulus, goal directed behaviors.
Addictors stimulate dopamine release in nucleus accumbens and throughout the brain.
Drugs that block dopamine block this response.
Dopamine coordinates responses throughout the brain, especially the emotional and memory parts of the brain. It provides information about what’s important to the organism a well as feeling of well being.
Dopamine does all this in all people, so why do only some people get addicted and most others don’t? The organisms (animals and humans) that get addicted are the ones that started genetically with low dopamine activity to begin with. This genetics separates people who get addicted and people who don’t. These genetically low dopamine people have, by definition, Hypoism. It is this low dopamine activity that causes these people to unconsciously seek out dopamine raisers, drugs and behaviors, and get addicted to them, all unconsciously, from the very beginning. This science dispels all other theories of addiction causation: psychological/psychodynamic/psychobabble, free will choice, immorality, and criminality. The Hypoism genetic dopamine deficiency physiology of addiction causation is both necessary and sufficient to explain addiction causation from the initiation of addictor use through addiction through relapse. Prevention and recovery must be derived from this theoretical basis, which, of course, the Hypoism recovery methodology does.
For the complete theory, read both:
 Other good links include: