exposing the dark side of adoption
Register Log in

tina's blog

by tina on Thursday, 31 January 2008

The ex-girlfriend of monster Ian Huntley is PREGNANT! Maxine Carr, just five years after helping Huntley lie about murdering 10-year-olds Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman says she is overjoyed at the prospect of becoming a mum.

Carr 30, a teaching assistant at their school, was jailed for 42 months for giving Huntley a false alibi. She served just half that time and was released 2004. Carr was given a new identity by the courts and given round-the-clock protection. She has been moved to at least 10 different locations for protection since leaving jail... all at the tax payers expense.

News of Carrs pregnancy will almost certainly haunt the parents of Holly and Jessica and cause even more pain for them. She should never be allowed to have a child but this is the UK. A land where monsters can bring up children and a place where innocent families are ripped apart to meet targets and annual budgets. Something is not right.

What of Carrs baby. Whatever the feelings are towards Carr her soon to be child is an innocent. An innocent who will be brought up by the tax payers and under police protection. That is no life for a child. You can read the full story from the People Sunday paper here

Mr Justice Munby

public
by tina on Thursday, 31 January 2008

Mr Justice Munby at the High Court said no baby could be removed "as the result of a decision taken by officials in some room". A voice of sanity in a web of madness. The baby boy was born healthy and taken from his 18 year old mother about two hours after his birth without any court order having been made.

Hospital staff were apparently shown a "birth plan" prepared by local authority social services. The plan said the mother, who had a troubled childhood and suffered from mental health problems, was to be separated from the child, and no contact allowed without supervision by social workers.

The judge said the removal of a child could only be lawful if a police constable was taking action to protect a child, or there was a court order in place. Mr Justice Munby said that without the appropriate order and given that the mother was still in hospital, mother and child should be reunited.

At last, Social Services have been made to follow the Queens Law and not its own law.

BBC NEWS

Today i UK

public
by tina on Thursday, 24 January 2008

A baby less than a year old was among 10 children taken into care after a police operation targeted gangs who used youngsters to pick pockets.

Officers from several forces, including the Metropolitan Police, raided 17 addresses across Slough, Berkshire.

At least 25 adults were held, accused of immigration breaches, deception, fraud, theft and pick-pocketing.

The inquiry surrounds child trafficking from Romania and the welfare of the children involved.

Police suspect poor families in eastern Europe may be forced into allowing gangs to take their children into the UK to carry out offences such as pickpocketing and thefts near cash machines.

kerrys question

public
by tina on Thursday, 24 January 2008

Can you please go into more detail about the difference between a "Missing Child" and  one that's been "Abducted for Adoption"?

Please bare with me because these boards are sending me doolally. Right kerry, I tried to reply to you question (the above) as a reply but couldnt copy pictures so Im having to put it in a blog. Plus dont know how to do quote so above is your quote (hope you understood that, not sure I did).

I really struggled about how and even if I should answer this question. Not because its a bad question but because of where it leads. Here goes. When I discovered the truth about my own adoption and the fact that basically I had with the help of a family member been stolen (something I am still struggling to deal with) I naturally started trying to find out how such a thing could happen. How could a child just be taken from its mother and never returned and why would no one question it. If my mum loved me and never got over losing me like she said then how could she have let it happen. All sounded bullshit to me. If a family member spirited away one of my kids there is no way I would accept it. like I said bullshit all of it. It didnt take me too long to find out how and why it could happen and that what I believed bullshit was sadly not as uncommon as you would have thought.

my mother was a single pregnant catholic girl and like many unwed mums in them days (1965) without support keeping the child was not an option. My mum was the youngest of a very large family and her mum had died in childbirth with her. Her Dad from what I can gather was a waste of space till the day he died when she was 8. The eldest brother became head of the house. A strict catholic, never missed a mass, went to confessions and got pissed on whiskey with the priest every week. A typical liverpool dockers life. When he found out my mum was pregnant he said he wasnt having no little bastard under his roof or in the family.  when she was still pregnant with me he told her he had found someone to take me and she agreed (she told me she didnt feel she had any choice) .  She said he wasnt someone you would argue with and thats just how things where then. She gave me away at ten days old but went and got me back the next day. For the next three years he made her life hell even though she married and was pregnant with my brother. She said he only ever refered to me as the little bastard and would spit on the ground if I was near him. They lived with him and his wife and their 5 kids. When she had my brother things got that bad she had a break down and was taken into hospital. Her husband had to work and the brother said he could only leave my brother with his wife when he went to work but he couldnt leave me. It was decided in the end that I would go and stay with the people who originally where going to have me just till my mum came home from hospital. She said she thought it was a kind offer and her husband could still go to work, my brother would be looked after and they could get the money together for a place of their own as soon as she was well.
My mum came home from hospital only to be told not to bother going to get me because I had long gone (my adop family moved house with me!). She went to the police told them her brother had given me away. The photo copy of the incident report I eventually got last year says (writing not too clear) After speaking to (mothers name) family members and the family priest satisfied child menntioned above is safe and wll with natural father. Mother is known to have long history of mental problems. Well she certainly did after that. My adop family along with her brother later went on to concoct a story and applied for adoption by mutual consent (without my mum knowing, wont bore you with any more details).

I know I waffled on a bit but if that was today that would answer the question about abduction for adoption. A missing child in my own mind would be a child who had randomly disapeared with foul play suspected. Just my own opinion.  Today however, things arent quite the same. Children are still abducted to order for the purpose of selling on for illegal adoption. Now though it is through corrupt governments and profiteers. Their is a much bigger and far more sinister child abduction racket happening now and adoption into familieshas turned into adoption into child porn industry.

Denise Pipitone, who was kidnapped 01-09-2004, at Mazara Del Vallo in the province of Trapani in Sicily. http://briansdreams.com/MISSING/publicr/537.htm shows many photos for viewers to see.  Is this the same child seen on the 18th October 2004 in milan? 2007 is this Denise?  Denises mother?

Whether it is Denise Pipitone in these images or not, It is certainly someones little girl. A child that is being used as a sex slave.

You may not remember the name Johhny Gosch; however, he was one of the very first missing children to ever be placed on a milk carton in the 1980’s.

Johnny’s disappearance triggered nationwide fears of child abductions. He was one of the first faces of missing or abducted children to appear on milk cartons across the country.

British Justice

public
by tina on Wednesday, 16 January 2008

I am not sure what I found the saddest when reading this. Lorraine Harris spent 16 months in prison wrongly accused  of shaking her baby to death. At the start of her sentence she gave birth to a baby boy  who was taken from her within hours of his birth and forcibly adopted.

Five years on  and her conviction was quashed due to medical evidence.  On Monday the  High Court upheld the Home Office decision not to award compensation. The reason for this, it was not a newly discovered fact that cleared her, it was simply  a revised statement of a medical opinion! This is British Justice at its best.

The whole story is awful. To have your child die and then be accused of killing it. How do you grieve under those circumstances.  Having to spend five years of your life  in prison with sex offenders then get released on electronic tag.  Having to cope with all that  while every single day thinking  about the child that was taken from you at birth. Lorraine says having her son taken from her has been the hardest thing to cope with, her son is now seven years old.

What choked me to tears was the statement she said about her son. She said she accepted the view of her son's adoptive parents, who refused her contact on the basis that it would be too disruptive. All she knows is that he lives somewhere in Yorkshire.  I would like to see just how disrupted  the son feels when he is older and discovers that he was denied any kind of relationship  with his mum. The adoptive parents aren't thinking of the child they are pure and simple thinking of themselves. The adoption should never of happened, an innocent mother had her son taken away.  A child cant have too many people to love them and I'm sure there could of been a way for the adoptive parents to allow a healthy loving relationship to develop and for them all to share in the happiness of his life. Alas no, they obviously have the mentality of 'finders keepers'  and 'ownership, 9/10s of the law.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7139385.stm

by tina on Tuesday, 15 January 2008



Tahla Ikram aged 17 months. You just want to kiss his little cheeks dont you? well you cant. He is DEAD! Closed family courts and the secrecey surrounding hearings mean authority officials have the safety net of unaccountability. If you need any proof of the failings of our Social Services or the damage that closed family courts result in , then carry on reading.

"The sheer scale of the injustice goes further than anyone can imagine"
We live in a country where at present a minority of gutless, ignorant and cruel individuals stand more unaccountable than ministers in our own government. An unaccountable minority making lives hell for thousands of families and their precious children each year. An unaccountable minority who escape prosecution for their perjurous crimes committed against innocent families in unaccountable family courts wrapped in secrecy. Unaccountable legal representatives who pretend to care right at the start only to deceive and ignore nearing the end. These are draconian laws, but made worse when twisted by local authority officials using a safety net of unaccountability.

Why are these children dying?
"Where's the justice for these children failed by secret professional thugs"


Aaron Gilbert aged 13 months

Chloe Thomas aged 14 weeks

John Smith aged 4
These are just a few of our children who have died due to the failings of our Social Services. Read their stories and many more http://www.fassit.co.uk/the_young_victims.htm.
Social Services and the Family Courts are responsible for our childrens welfare. Decisions as to whether families stay together or seperate, some to never see each other again,are made in these very courts. That is why the family laws need to change and our courts need to open up. The secrecies need to stop so that real protection can be given.
by tina on Tuesday, 15 January 2008
Cllr Shireen Ritchie, Cabinet Member for Family and Children's Services and the driving force behind Chelsea's middle class adoption team. What a woman and what a world she lives in.
Last year she kicked of the 'its the magic of being a family' campaign. She delighted the conservative women of Chelsea with her adventuress approach. Instead of the usual adoption events being held in the Town Hall she took the magic of adoption to the people. Brent Park Tesco in Neasden, was the first port of call. Where better to set up a stand to promote the magic of adoption. The check out at the local supermarket.

'It's the magic of being a family' had taken months of preparing (so we were told)Cllr Shireen Ritchie said: "It's very important to provide a permanent home for children when it is not possible for them to live with their own family. Children are the future and it is vital that we give every child the best possible opportunity in life." Then announced the final leg of the campaign. Centre Court Shopping Centre, Queens Road, Wimbledon, and then on to the foyer area at Tesco, Great Central Way, Neasden.

She was completely oblivious to the fact that the posters of children in need of a magic family looked like a marketing campaign for the up and coming in store Christmas grotto. She made another slight error of judgment
also in her search for magic mummies and daddies. The residence of her nice borough have their Nannies or Au pairs do the shopping at Tesco. Silly woman.

Did I mention that Cllr Shireen Ritchie, is also the mother in law of Madonna and step mother to Guy Ritchie non the less. She appeared on GMTV last week to highlight her adoption campaign. Being interviewed by the non too intelligent Fiona Phillips.

Fiona Phillips asked: “You have probably one of the most famous adopted little grandsons in the whole world now. How’s that all working out?”

“It’s working out very well,” Ritchie replied. “They’re wonderful and loving parents and he’s a very lucky little boy.”

interview

Excuse me! well it goes some way in explaining just why adoptees always feel somewhat 'lucky' and grateful, similar to a sack full of puppies saved from the canal. Yes, lets hope little David appreciates how lucky he is to have his mum die and lose his remaining family. This woman has a voice in UK adoption and it is a voice that is heard. We un -grateful little bastards need to use our own voices and loudly demand the respect and the right to live without owing a debt of gratitude to any fucker that patted us on the head as we passed.
by tina on Tuesday, 15 January 2008

At the end of the last year I was ready to give up. Not kill myself. Just give up. I was sick of how I was feeling, I was hurting proper bad. My eating disorder had come back with a vengeance and I just felt alone and stupid.

I don't think I will ever get over the fact that people who supposedly loved me convinced me 100% that I was borderline schizophrenic rather than be honest with me and also allow me to keep what where in fact memories. I often have to stop and remind myself that I am not nuts and that people are not noticing that I am (hard to explain). Christmas gave me a much needed wake up call. My daughter had asked me what her friend had said when she called at the house few days earlier. I couldn't remember word for word but told her she was going to call again on xmas day.

Ten minutes later my daughter came back in and asked me if I was sure that she had said xmas day. That was it. My head started working over time. Questions, questions, questions. Had she said xmas day or had i imagined it. As quick as I went into 'disguise my panic' mode I was snapped back out of it... By my daughter. 'mum switch ya head off cos ya not mad she probably did say that'.

What a fuck up! My own daughter having to remind me I'm not mad (or ever was). That's just not right. My weight was 6st 1lb I cried more than I smiled and instead of time healing me it was consuming me. Why, What for? A past I can never change.

I know I wont be able to control those lapses in believing in myself over night, God I have lived since I was 16 trying to avoid people from noticing and knowing I was mad , in fact I had done such a good job of it people thought I was really level headed and had my head screwed on! fuck me though I did, I just didn't know it.

by tina on Monday, 14 January 2008

Ask yourself this. Could there be a more motivating factor than finding a missing child safe and well. In the hearts and minds of any decent human being, the child is all the motivation needed. Every now and again though something comes up that makes you ask questions.

Take the search for Maddie McCann. I know I have spoke on the McCanns before but they have created their own media monster for the inquisitive to explore.

Well we know a fair bit about the people they employ for their now limited business but what of the backers. The generosity of some has been incredible.

Richard Branson:  pledged to pay all the McCanns legal fees. After Maddies disappearance on May 3rd Prime Minister Gordon Brown publicly pledged his support (as he should) to the McCanns. He was fully updated at all times and in constant talks with Gerry McCann. JK Rowling – rags to riches – from single parent on benefits to becoming the renowned writer of the Harry Potter Books. Contributed an unclosed sum. Bill Kenwright actor and successful producer. Contributed an unclosed sum. You may remember he donated £2000,000. The list continues. When reading all the individual reports in the media no immediate connection between these people springs to mind but...

Prime Minister Gordon Brown: suddenly distances himself with all things McCann, at the same time they are announced official suspects. He even refused a meeting with them saying the government had done all it could with the information available.

UK Decoy Tactics

public
by tina on Thursday, 10 January 2008

Over the past two years I have been to Internet adoption sites almost daily. Adoption related forums give great insight to how adoption effects people.

It soon became clear that laws and issues surrounding adoption differ from country to country.

One thing that surprised me was how the UK was perceived. The majority believing that the UK has no adoption problems. Well, I know from where I'm sitting there is a problem or three!

I decided to take a trip around the adoption web world with foreign eyes.

It didn't take me long to understand why the UK could be seen by some as a country that had got 'IT' right.